Absolutely nothing Ear 2 review: it is what's on the inside that matters

Absolutely nothing Ear 2 review: it is what's on the inside that matters

2 years later on and it is time for a revitalize with the imaginatively called Ear 2 earbuds. They include some nice quality-of-life features such as support for multipoint connection, but essentially they're very just like their precursors. Put both beside each various other, and it can be hard to inform them apart.

Being used, however, the Absolutely nothing Ear twos seem like a a lot more polished item. There are less insects, more qualified energetic sound termination, and a far better and more refined sound. It is enough to transform the Ear twos from a attractive set of earbuds with just alright efficiency right into a device that (almost) sounds just comparable to it appearances. It is simply a pity that, at $149, they're not the entry-level bargain this time around about.

Absolutely nothing Ear 2 review: it is what's on the inside that matters

The Absolutely nothing Ear 2 earbuds currently begin at $149, a half increase over the beginning price of the Absolutely nothing Ear 1s initial $99 price point. That is not completely unexpected after Absolutely nothing enhanced the price of the Ear 1 earbuds by the same quantity last October, but it impacts that the Ear 2's rivals are. $149 is within striking range of the (often discounted) AirPods and the same price as Samsung's Galaxy Buds 2, for instance. It means Nothing's buds need to hit a a lot greater bar compared to their precursors.

Absolutely nothing Ear 2 review: it is what's on the inside that matters

But side-by-side with the Absolutely nothing Ear 1s, the physical distinctions seem small. The Ear 2's situation is slightly slimmer and lighter, and the earbuds themselves are slightly taller and also slightly lighter. But appearance, the measurements are shut enough that the earbuds can fit in either billing situation (however they're not functionally cross-compatible throughout generations). One functional change, however, is that Absolutely nothing says it is using more durable plastic this time around about, which should in theory decrease the quantity of scrapes compared with what we saw show up on our Ear 1 situation.

Absolutely nothing Ear 2 review: it is what's on the inside that matters

Battery life is both better and even worse compared to the Ear 1 earbuds. With energetic sound termination (ANC) on, Absolutely nothing claims the Ear twos offer 4 hrs of playback from the buds themselves (like the Ear 1s), rising to 22.5 hrs with the situation (slightly even worse compared to the 24 hrs declared last time). But transform ANC off, and those numbers rise to 6.3 hrs and 36 hrs (slightly better compared to the Ear 1's 5.7 and 34-hour scores).

That battery life isn't great compared with a great deal of the Ear 2's sound cancellation-capable rivals. Samsung's Galaxy Buds 2 offer a more outstanding 5 hrs of ANC playback from the buds themselves (however undoubtedly just 20 hrs combined with their case), while Apple's more expensive AirPods Professional 2 offer 6 hrs of ANC paying attention from the buds, or 30 combined with the situation. Actors your eye over our buying overview of the best cordless earbuds and many of our picks offer 6 hrs or more.

Such as the Ear 1s, you still obtain cordless billing here, which is particularly useful if you have actually a telephone that can do reverse cordless billing such as the Telephone 1. Or else, there is a USB-C to USB-C cable television in package for wired billing. Such as an enhancing quantity of customer technology, there is no billing block consisted of.

Absolutely nothing Ear (2) review

The Absolutely nothing Ear (2) is its "very first second generation item," the company says, which is definitely among the declarations ever made. The new model features a variety of improvements but focuses one of the most on improving the sound quality over its precursor. At $149, the Ear (2) costs the like the present price of the Ear (1), which initially introduced at $99. There is a great deal to discuss so let's simply solve right into it.

Absolutely nothing Ear 2 review: it is what's on the inside that matters


The design of the Ear (2) has seen some changes, mainly about the situation. The new situation is smaller sized in every measurement but you can just truly inform the distinction if you have actually it besides the old one.

The new situation has more tilted sides compared with the contours of its precursor. The cover has a comparable look but the large dimple in the center that held the earbuds in position is made smaller sized.

All-time low of the situation appears they removed its cover. The Ear (1) situation had a bottom cover that enclosed all the nontransparent plastics inside but the Ear (2) situation fallen leaves the white plastic little bits dangling outside and you can also feel the contour of the receptacles for the earbuds. The lack of shiny plastics under should decrease the look of scrapes, which was a problem with the previous situation.

Talking the white plastics, they no much longer have the dimpled finish of their precursor, rather having actually a ordinary white structure that you could actually touch this time around since they are no much longer protected by clear plastic. For the length of time they remain white when in contact with the outdoors remains to be seen.

There's something about the design of the Ear (2) situation that makes it feel and look such as a downgrade. It seems like they removed pieces of clear plastic from everywhere and made the nontransparent plastic blander and featureless to save money on costs. The new cover with its smaller sized joint also had a great deal more side-to-side movement compared to my two-year-old Ear (1) models. The Ear (1) situation cover also had a a lot more satisfying thump when shut while the Ear (2) cover constantly shuts with a clank.

The new design is also more aesthetically uniform and not in a great way. The Ear (1) situation had a smaller sized magnet and a wider joint that made it easy to inform one side from the various other. The Ear (2) has a joint and magnet design that appearances very comparable fit and dimension and it's really hard to inform which way it opens up without paying complete attention every time.

The real earbuds are very just like their precursors. The just noticeable distinction is the switch to pressure-sensitive switches rather than a touch-sensitive location on the side for motions.

Both the situation and the earbuds are waterproof. The situation is ranked IP55 and the earbuds at IP54. This is an enhancement over the previous model, which just carried an IPX4 score for the earbuds.

Overall, the Ear (2) seems like a downgrade in the design division, which is strange considering it was one of the most widely applauded aspect of the Ear (1). While one could suggest the initial model was much too indulgent and possibly wasteful with its use plastic, it's what gave it its distinctive design. The Ear (2) seems like it is attempting to imitate that visual with a 3rd of the budget and finishes up seeming like a knockoff at the same time. It is still an extremely attractive and unique design simply not just comparable to the first one.


The Ear (2) are a comfy set of earbuds. The mass of the design rests inside your ears, leaving just a small bit dangling outside. The internal ear form is inconspicuous and the silicone tips are soft and pleasant on the ear.

The issue is with the new pressure-sensitive motion location on the earbuds. These work well when you're deliberately using them but are incredibly easy to push also when you're simply grabbing the stem to draw them from your ears. This happened almost every time I removed them as it takes no initiative at all to activate the motion.

Eventually, I needed to hotel to uncommon holds such as holding the stem on top and bottom while drawing them out. This isn't a risk-free way to handle the earbuds as the chance of going down them is a lot greater but I'd instead take that chance compared to push the switch every solitary time I remove the earbuds.

Software and features

The Ear (2) can be controlled using the Absolutely nothing X application for iOS and Android or through the Bluetooth setups on a Telephone (1). From here, you can change the ANC setups, the touch motions, the sound impacts, as well as access features such as reduced latency setting, personalized ANC and sound account, and find my earbuds.

The ANC has 3 manual degrees of modification and a 4th flexible setting, which changes on the fly for your environments. There's also a customized ANC option, which runs an examination to change the ANC regularity reaction for your ears and present ambient problems. This test can just be run when there suffices ambient sound about you or else it simply will not let you.

The problem with personalized ANC, something I noticed with the OnePlus Buds Professional 2 as well, is that the account it generates is hyper-specific for your present ambient sound pattern. This can produce great outcomes if you're, say, in an plane and the ambient sound pattern is very consistent. However, if the sound differs a great deal after that you might not obtain great outcomes. Also, attempting to use a account produced in one environment somewhere else can also produce even worse outcomes. In these situations, it's better to simply disable personalized ANC and use the standard one.

The application also offers an ear suggestion in shape test. In the previously firmware, the test tone played to inspect this was similar to the one you find on Oppo earbuds and OnePlus. A later on upgrade to the earbuds changed this to a various tone but considering the background in between the previously mentioned brand names and Nothing's creator I thought the circumstance was quite amusing.

The Ear (2) also offers a customized EQ in the application, something the Ear (1) does not have to today. It is not much; you obtain a 3-band modification set out in a nonsensical round pattern but it is better compared to simply the 4 presets that the Ear (1) had.

The Ear (2) also allows you call in a customized sound account. The test treatment to calibrate this varies a little bit from what we have seen from various other brand names. You first need to set a degree for a white sound example, which will be played behind-the-scenes. Once done, each earbud will play an examination tone that slowly decreases in quantity, and the point where you quit listening to it establishes the degree for that regularity.

This process was more undesirable compared to I expected. Having actually the fairly loud white sound example constantly play in among your ears isn't enjoyable and the test can take quite a while to finish. I would certainly not criticize anybody for obtaining restless and terminating the test midway.

Finally, you can also change the options for the squeeze motions. You can set various options for the left and right earbuds but you obtain the same set of options to choose from for both. Not all options are available for all motions and the solitary squeeze motion cannot be changed at all. This makes the previously mentioned issue of unintentional presses particularly annoying since you can't also disable the solitary push motion such as you can on some various other earbuds.

The Ear (2) had small insects throughout testing. The ear discovery often quit functioning and the earbuds would certainly not respond to being removed from the ear. This means there was no automated pausing and the sound would certainly simply maintain having fun. This would certainly usually just occur to simply one earbud each time, so if you took out the various other after that the sound would certainly pause as intended. Placing the earbuds back in the event would certainly make them work normally again.

While not a insect, I also wanted to keep in mind the quantity of the various notifies on the earbuds. The sound the earbuds make when inserted right into your ears can be quite loud sometimes. Similarly, the sound for reduced battery alert is also loud and surprised me every time. There are no factors for these notifies to be as loud and annoying as they presently are.


All monitorings in this review are with the firmware variation, which was the newest available at the moment of testing.

Sound quality

The Absolutely nothing Ear (2) uses upgraded drivers over the previous model. They have the same 11.6mm vibrant design but the diaphragm is upgraded with a brand-new material that uses polyurethane and graphene. The interior of the earbuds has also been upgraded with a brand-new dual-chamber design. The earbuds also support LHDC 5.0 (also known as LHDC-V) along with AAC and SBC. Although still a lossy codec, LHDC 5.0 currently supports up to 192kHz sampling prices and up to 1Mbps bitrate.

Before entering into the sound, I want to mention that there was distinct high-frequency distortion when using LHDC 5.0 at the default setup with our Absolutely nothing Telephone (1) review unit. This could be refixed by changing the bitrate worths but that triggered various other problems, which are discussed in the Connection area. Most of the sound testing was finished with LHDC 3.0 rather together with AAC and SBC.

The Ear (2) is a good-sounding set of earbuds that's significantly improved over its precursor. It has the same kind of v-shaped adjusting but still comes throughout as seeming incredibly better in many locations.

The low-end still has a bass boost rack used but it appears to quit lower down in the regularity range compared to before production it more local to the lower bass areas. The bass also has much less bloat compared to before and has a a lot much faster attack and degeneration that sounds more precise and punchier. It is among the more pleasurable bass tunings I've listened to in this section and never ever really feels puffed up or frustrating.

The mid-range also shows significant improvement on the Ear (2). The Ear (1) had a rather congested, fuzzier-sounding mid-range that simply offered to prop up the treble areas and bass. The mid-range on the Ear (2) sounds a lot more fleshed out and compatible the remainder of the regularity range. There's a a lot greater sense of information and splitting up here that was missing out on before.

Having actually said that, the mid-range on the Ear (2) is still not perfect. There's a dip in the mids that causes certain man vocals to shed all presence and authority in the blend. This doesn't affect deeper man vocals or female vocals as the dip is relatively narrow band in nature.

Sadly, the treble area remains a factor of opinion for the Ear (2). This is currently the 3rd Absolutely nothing sound item straight where the treble is simply way too warm. This isn't constantly an issue as it helps draw out the air regularities and information in the tools and female vocals on some of the tracks. After that on the very next track, a cymbal hit or a higher-pitched female articulate will shred through your ears.

It is not simply the high treble that is warm. The top midrange is also slightly highlighted, which can cause female vocals to be ahead and man vocals to have a nasal timbre. Appearing of a dip in the lower mids, this highlighted area is especially distinct on certain blends.

Sadly, there's little you can do with the EQ to fix this. The 3 bands of modification offered here give hardly any room to call in precise modification. Moreover, production bigger changes to the EQ causes the sound to change significantly throughout the range. The overall sound is significantly quieter when you increase any one of the 3 bands and the focus appears to shift to whatever band you're changing. Rather than simply production the band louder, the remainder of the sound also obtains inexplicably quieter.

The same point happens when you enable the individual sound account. Most of the moment the custom account would certainly have included EQ boost throughout certain regularity ranges (usually high regularities) to make up for your listening to loss and this once again causes the remainder of the range to obtain quieter when allowed. This made the feature rather pointless as I could not inform if the customization formula took right into account the sound changing inside while also representing my listening to.

Leaving apart EQ shenanigans and the sometimes murderous treble, the Ear (2) can often be really engaging and pleasurable to pay attention to. The drivers are plainly of a better this time around about and it comes through in the sound. The sound is also decently spacious with a common sense of imaging and placing about the space. The tasteful bass adjusting also helps raise the sound over most various other offerings in this section. I simply wish Absolutely nothing would certainly overcome its fascination with ear-piercing treble or at the very least offer users a more fancy custom EQ.


The microphone efficiency was average. The articulate sounds all-natural but the hostile history sound termination formula reduces in frequently also in peaceful environments and causes dips in your articulate while you're talking. If they could simply decline the sound termination a little bit after that the voices could sound a lot more clear.

Sound termination

The Ear (2) has average sound terminating efficiency that sadly has a couple of problems.

For whatever factor, the ANC maintains fluctuating in effectiveness, which is incredibly visible if you do not have anything having fun. Also when by hand readied to the High setting, the ANC maintains changing its degrees every couple of secs in an extremely obvious manner. It does not also appear such as it is changing to the environments but instead in an arbitrary pattern. One second it appears to be functioning fine, the next all of a sudden there is a great deal more low-frequency sound being allow. This is more visible when outdoors but it also happens in quieter places. You simply are much less most likely to notice it there, particularly with songs having fun.

As mentioned before, the personalized ANC is also not the silver bullet it might appear such as. The adjusting it generates is particularly for your present ambient sound degrees, which does not provide great outcomes in various other atmospheres. In truth, in many circumstances, the basic ANC simply provided better outcomes after several manual personalized ANC calibration tests. I would certainly still suggest using it when you get on an airplane so it sets itself to that sound degree but after that also try switching it off to see if points are better or even worse.

Also at its best, the ANC is a strong degree 3, if the best ANC presently available on TWS is a degree 5. This is an enhancement over the Ear (1), which was hardly a degree 2 but still not just comparable to some of the best we have seen, such as the Sony LinkBuds S. It does an alright job of radio frequencies but mid and high regularities aren't as well attenuated. Also resting here today as I kind this, I can easily listen to the AC operating behind me over the songs. If I was using the LinkBuds S today I would certainly forget the AC was also on.

The openness setting is also simply alright. It sounds a little bit muffled but is still functional overall.


The Ear (2) has bad latency efficiency. Without the reduced lag option in the Absolutely nothing X application, the default latency is terrible, clocking in at about 300ms. This makes it pointless with devices that do not support the Absolutely nothing X application, such as computer systems or media gamers.

With the reduced lag option allowed, the latency is still a little bit bad but should be passable for laid-back video pc gaming or applications that let you play tools, for instance.

Also when simply watching video clips on the telephone the latency is visible. This is usually a non-issue as phones will immediately sync the video clip to change for the sound delay but the delay on the Ear (2) is so great by default that the sync is still imperfect. Also for video clip, I would certainly suggest enabling the reduced lag setting to obtain great synchronization.


The Ear (2) had a variety of connection problems throughout testing. For one, LHDC 5.0 simply doesn't work as intended. Setting it fully 1Mbps bitrate on the Absolutely nothing Telephone (1) causes it to begin stuttering after a couple of become pointless and secs. Also 900kbps is pointless. It is just when you copulate to 500kbps does it work rather stably. All these monitorings are with the telephone much less compared to an arm's size away on a workdesk while resting still. Points would certainly be a lot even worse if the telephone remained in a bag or pocket.

Since the testing for LHDC 5.0 was done completely with the Absolutely nothing Telephone (1) it was difficult to separate the problems to simply the earbuds, the telephone, or both. In either case, they both come from the same company, so currently it is on them to determine where the issue exists.

As mentioned in the sound quality area, there was also distortion when using LHDC 5.0. This in some way just manifested at 500kbps and lower bitrates, which as mentioned over are the just functional ones. You could go greater, at which point the distortion quits but after that the sound starts stuttering.

These problems made LHDC 5.0 totally pointless on our review unit. Going down to LHDC 3.0, which was the next available option on the Telephone (1) refixed the distortion issue but I could still run right into sound stuttering if I obtained too enthusiastic with the bitrate.

I also had a difficult time obtaining LHDC to work at all with some non-Nothing phones. It functioned fine with Xiaomi phones but would not work on OnePlus phones with Qualcomm chipsets. On OnePlus phones with MediaTek chipsets, the Bluetooth food selection would certainly say it was using LHDC but the designer setups revealed it was actually simply AAC unless you changed by hand.

When it comes to SBC and AAC, there were no observed problems as both functioned perfectly. This is equally as well since on most phones you'll be stuck using either of these codecs, as LHDC is still a little bit of a rarity beyond a handful of brand names. I'm not truly certain why Absolutely nothing would certainly choose LHDC over the common LDAC, particularly with the range of problems their LHDC application has. LDAC is a lot more dependable in my experience and is sustained by basically every Android telephone on the marketplace today since it is built right right into the OS.

Thankfully, both AAC and SBC sound simply fine, so you do not need to have FOMO if your device doesn't support LHDC.

The Ear (2) does support connecting to 2 devices at the same time. This is a relatively easy point to do and the earbuds can use LHDC with both paired devices, should they support it. It also functioned well other than that once when among the paired devices could just connect to among the earbuds while the various other was connected to both but as with various other insects this was fixed by placing the earbuds in the attempting again and situation.


The Ear (2) have a ranked battery of 6.3 hrs with ANC off and 4 hrs with ANC on. I could not test ANC-on efficiency as the ANC is just energetic when the earbuds spot being put in your ears, which means it cannot be triggered as the earphones aren't worn throughout the battery test run.

So for the ANC off outcomes, I evaluated with AAC and LHDC. The AAC run provided a battery life of 5.7 hrs, which is shut enough to the 6.3 hrs number that Absolutely nothing provided to earn it clear it was evaluated with either AAC or SBC. However, the LHDC test competed simply 4 hrs, which is way off and simply inadequate generally. And simply to restate, this is with the ANC off.

So if you used the Ear (2) as intended, with LHDC and ANC, you're looking at 2-3 hrs of battery life, which is pretty awful for a set of modern earbuds.

Our review unit also had a large inconsistency in between both earbuds with the left one having actually a a lot even worse battery life. To give the item the benefit of the doubt, the numbers over are from the right unit which lasted much longer. The left one usually was dead a great hr very early.

Final thought

At the beginning of the review, I said the focus with the Ear (2) got on improving the sound quality, which was practically what I observed. The sound quality is unquestionably better on the Ear (2) compared with the previous model. In truth, it's among the best-sounding cordless earbuds in its price range, despite its problems with the treble being a little bit too bright.

Apart from that, the Ear (2) is disappointing for a sequel. The design, which everybody and their chihuahua raved about last time, really feels removed downgraded and down. The Absolutely nothing X application is still limited in regards to customizability and the software can still be buggy sometimes. Battery life is also quite bad, as is the latency efficiency. Points also simply do not work as expected; the ANC has problems as does the elegant new LHDC 5.0 codec.

There's a great deal of room here for improvement and it can be done through updates. The Ear (1) also had a rough begin but they did manage to obtain it functioning well eventually. I'm certain the Ear (2) will be fine eventually but we don't review on the basis of future potential and today the Ear (2) isn't an item we can suggest.


  • Still has an unique design
  • Great overall sound quality
  • Comfy
  • Double link support
  • IP score for situation and earbuds


  • Severe treble tuningInconsistent ANC efficiency
  • LHDC 5.0 application has many problems
  • Squeeze motions are way too delicate
  • Bad battery lifeSubpar latency for video pc gaming
  • Absolutely nothing X application offers limited customizability
  • Situation feels and look even worse compared to the Ear (1)

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post